PT

Dados B3 › Restatements

Has GAMA PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A. (OPGM3) ever restated its financial statements? In which years?

Yes: the statements for 2010, 2012 came back with different figures in the following year's annual filing — 4 account(s) in all, each below with both values.

YearAccountAggregationAs first filedAs restatedDifferenceRevealed in (CVM file)
2010cash and equivalents (BPA 1.01.01)individual — company does not consolidateno value in the fileR$ 4.9 m—DFP 2011 · 04/04/2012
2010financial investments (BPA 1.01.02)individual — company does not consolidateR$ 4.9 mno value in the file—DFP 2011 · 04/04/2012
2012internal changes in equity (DMPL 5.06)individual — company does not consolidateR$ -698 kno value in the file—DFP 2013 · 19/03/2014
2012closing equity (DMPL 5.07)individual — company does not consolidateR$ 942 kR$ 1.6 m42.6%DFP 2013 · 19/03/2014

How it is detected: each year appears twice at the CVM — in its own annual filing and as the comparative in the next one. A difference above 0.5% in a key account is recorded, never corrected silently. Only the aggregation the site publishes (consolidated, or individual when the company does not consolidate) counts. In the years marked individual, the company does not consolidate: the individual statements are the only aggregation it publishes, and their restatement is an ordinary restatement. “No value in the file” means the account came empty (zero) in that CVM file. Descriptive, not investment advice.

OPGM3 — company page · all restatements in the base

Numbers on this page are live. Data version 2026-09-27-reapresentacao-agreg · page generated 2026-09-27 07:50 UTC. If this does not match /saude, you are reading a cached copy.

Sources: CVM (open data, ODbL) and B3 (COTAHIST). Not affiliated with B3 or the CVM. Not investment advice.

Numbers on this page are live. Data version 2026-09-27-reapresentacao-agreg · page generated 2026-09-27 07:50 UTC. If this does not match /saude, you are reading a cached copy.